Small-Scale Velocity Turbulence Sensors for Undersea Platforms
Navy SBIR 2019.2 - Topic N192-120
NAVSEA - Mr. Dean Putnam -
Opens: May 31, 2019 - Closes: July 1, 2019 (8:00 PM ET)


TITLE: Small-Scale Velocity Turbulence Sensors for Undersea Platforms


TECHNOLOGY AREA(S): Battlespace, Electronics, Sensors


ACQUISITION PROGRAM: SEA073, Advanced Submarine Systems Development


OBJECTIVE: Design and fabricate a rugged velocity sensor capable of measuring small-scale velocity turbulence in the ocean for extended periods.


DESCRIPTION: The Navy currently has no permanent way of measuring small-scale ocean turbulence from submerged platforms for extended periods. Sensors available to the Navy that are capable of directly or indirectly measuring turbulence are very fragile, incapable of collecting measurements at the sampling rate required to characterize small-scale turbulence, or susceptible to noise contamination at high speed. Data that a rugged ocean turbulence sensor with a high sampling rate is capable of providing is needed for ship situational and vulnerability

awareness and to feed Naval Oceanographic Office (NAVO) databases to allow better use of the environment in mission planning.


Sensors that are capable of measuring turbulent water velocities have been used to carry out oceanographic measurements for decades. These sensors are typically fragile and prone to failure when operated in harsh environments or high-speed conditions for extended periods. Measurements made by these instruments have proven quite valuable for characterizing the physics of ocean turbulence. Similar measurements would enhance the capabilities of U.S. Navy platforms. Navy submarines and Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (UUV) are the primary target platforms for this type of sensor. The size, weight and power requirements are limited to the extent that the sensor is able to fit and operate on a 12 ¾ inch UUV. Permanent installation of these types of sensors enables long- term data collection to fill a NAVO data gap. Examples of existing sensors include the Rockland Scientific shear probe, the Nobska Modular Acoustic Velocity Sensor (MAVS), the Sontek Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV), Falmouth Scientific Acoustic Current Meters, and electromagnetic (EM) velocity probes. The Rockland Scientific shear probe measures velocity shear by converting lift induced mechanical fluctuations of the probe tip into electrical signals; the acoustic sensors operate by measuring sound travel time or Doppler, while the EM sensor detects fluctuations in the local electromagnetic field.


Although typical oceanographic measurements for research purposes generally take place under conditions that are of low risk to the instrument, measurements made from Navy platforms in harsh conditions for extended periods are common. For example, shear probe measurements are generally taking place from a microstructure profiler, a small oceanographic platform that is allowed to freefall through the water column at low speed and under very quiet conditions over short periods (approximately minutes or hours). While measurements taken this way, or on a low- speed platform, are capable of measuring small scale velocities, on the order of 1cm, high-speed platforms introduce increased forcing on the sensor, noise levels, and length scale limitations (due to limited sampling rates). Therefore, current state-of-the-art ocean velocity sensors are generally not suited for Navy vessels.


The velocity sensor must be robust and sturdy enough to allow existing naval platforms to measure small-scale turbulent velocities ranging from 1cm to 100m at speeds up to at least 5kn (which equates to a bandwidth of 0.025 – 250 Hz). The software will be sensor-specific and will interface with operating systems that are prevalent on Navy computers, such as Windows and Linux. The software can be either Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) or custom. For potential software modification purposes, a common programming language, such as C++, will also be used.

The sensor must also be able to survive exposure to harsh environments that involve exposure to seawater for a minimum of 3 months while needing little to no maintenance while at sea. The sensor must also be able to withstand environmental contamination such as bio-fouling and incidental contact with deployment vessels, handling equipment, and submerged or floating oceanic debris. The sensor must be tested in conjunction with similar industry standard oceanographic velocity sensors in a controlled environment such as the tow-tank at the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division (Newport). After successful laboratory testing, the prototype will be refined and must be tested at sea on an existing Navy platform or on a research vessel (R/V) or unmanned undersea vehicle as necessity and availability dictate. If installed on a submarine, the sensor must meet qualifications regarding electromagnetic interference and shock testing. Validation and testing will take place in a full-scale scenario in locations in which ocean turbulence at the scales of interest can be measured simultaneously with a baseline sensor such as those listed above.


PHASE I: Develop a concept for a velocity sensor that meets the requirements above. Demonstrate feasibility through modeling and simulation. Ensure that the concept sensor is rugged enough to withstand the conditions encountered while operating at sea on U.S. Navy platforms at high speed for a minimum of 3 months Develop a Phase II plan. The Phase I Option, if exercised, will include the initial design and capabilities description to build the sensor in Phase II.


PHASE II: Develop and deliver a small scale velocity turbulence sensor prototype. Evaluate the prototype based on laboratory measurements, modeling, or at-sea measurements showing that the requirements of the velocity sensor are met by comparing to industry standards for ocean velocity measurements taken by sensors such as a shear probe or MAVS. Deliver the final product to the Navy, including the velocity sensor prototype and the hardware, firmware, and software necessary to test and operate the sensor on an undersea platform. Prepare a Phase III

development plan to transition the technology to Navy use.


PHASE III DUAL USE APPLICATIONS: Support the Navy in transitioning the technology for Navy use on a submarine or UUV. Deliver an interface control document (ICD) to allow the development of Navy software to use the sensor without the need to rely on vendor-supplied software. Following demonstration of the sensor performance, required qualifications such as electromagnetic interference and shock testing will take place prior to installation on a Navy vessel.


To maximize use of the velocity sensor technology, this sensor technology could be commercialized for use by the oceanographic community at large for scientific and research uses. Organizations interested in oceanographic research and data collection such as universities will find high value in these sensors.



1.   Williams, A. J. “Linearity and Noise in Differential Travel Time Acoustic Velocity Measurement.” Proceedings of the IEEE Fifth Working Conference on Current Measurement, 7-9 March 1995, pp. 215-219.


2.   Macoun, Paul and Lueck, Rolf. “Modeling the Spatial Response of the Airfoil Shear Probe using Different Sized Probes.” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanographic Technology, 21, 15 March 2003, pp. 284-297. 0426%282004%29021%3C0284%3AMTSROT%3E2.0.CO%3B2


3.   Soloviev, A., et. al. “A Near-Surface Microstructure Sensor System Used during TOGA COARE. Part II: Turbulence Measurements.” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 16, Nov 1999, pp. 1598-1618.


KEYWORDS: Velocity Microstructure; Turbulence Dissipation; Turbulent Kinetic Energy; Rugged Turbulence Sensor; Small-Scale Turbulence Sensor; Ocean Turbulence Sensor



Dr. Derrick Custodio






S. Bradford Doyle






These Navy Topics are part of the overall DoD 2019.2 SBIR BAA. The DoD issued its 2019.2 BAA SBIR pre-release on May 2, 2019, which opens to receive proposals on May 31, 2019, and closes July 1, 2019 at 8:00 PM ET.

Between May 2, 2019 and May 30, 2019 you may communicate directly with the Topic Authors (TPOC) to ask technical questions about the topics. During these dates, their contact information is listed above. For reasons of competitive fairness, direct communication between proposers and topic authors is not allowed starting May 31, 2019
when DoD begins accepting proposals for this BAA.

NOTICE: The data above is for casual reference only. The official DoD/Navy topic description and BAA information is available on FedBizOpps at

Help: If you have general questions about DoD SBIR program, please contact the DoD SBIR Help Desk at 800-348-0787 or via email at